On 03/25/2015 06:43 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 01:24:01PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch> wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Linus Walleij >>> <linus.wall...@linaro.org> wrote: >> >>> So summary: >>> - Reusing the dynamic gpio lookup stuff would be nice, and might be >>> interesting as a new crazy use-case (or maybe not). But not a >>> requirement since we have the component framework to handroll >>> something. >> >> OK I guess you have me convinced, I will apply the patch from >> Shobhit. If it turns out ugly we can always revert it. If you believe >> in it, it's worth a try. >> >> Also as you say else it will be reinvented, let's go this way as it >> is likely the lesser of two evils. > > Thanks for reconsidering. > > I quickly checked out your linux-gpio and it only has patch 2 to implement > the gpio. We also need patch 1 (but with the leak Thierry spotted fixed). > Should we drop Shobit's patch until that's done?
Will work on this. Regards Shobhit > > Wrt merging the 4.1 window on the drm side is pretty much closed so I > think I'll have to postpone the i915 side to 4.2 anyway. Luckily there's > no direct depencies because we look up everything dynamically, so patches > can go in in any order. > > Cheers, Daniel > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
