> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-boun...@osuosl.org> On Behalf Of Jacob 
> Keller
> Sent: 02 May 2025 04:24
> To: Intel Wired LAN <intel-wired-...@lists.osuosl.org>; Nguyen, Anthony L 
> <anthony.l.ngu...@intel.com>; netdev <net...@vger.kernel.org>
> Cc: Keller, Jacob E <jacob.e.kel...@intel.com>; Kubiak, Michal 
> <michal.kub...@intel.com>; Loktionov, Aleksandr 
> <aleksandr.loktio...@intel.com>; Kolacinski, Karol 
> <karol.kolacin...@intel.com>; Kitszel, Przemyslaw 
> <przemyslaw.kits...@intel.com>; Olech, Milena <milena.ol...@intel.com>; Paul 
> Menzel <pmen...@molgen.mpg.de>
> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v4 10/15] ice: use bitfields instead of 
> unions for CGU regs
>
> From: Karol Kolacinski <karol.kolacin...@intel.com>
>
> Switch from unions with bitfield structs to definitions with bitfield masks. 
> This is necessary, because some registers have different field definitions or 
> even use a different register for the same fields based on HW type.
>
> Remove unused register fields.
>
> Reviewed-by: Milena Olech <milena.ol...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Karol Kolacinski <karol.kolacin...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_common.h | 212 ++++---------------------  
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_tspll.c  | 234 ++++++++++++++--------------
> 2 files changed, 153 insertions(+), 293 deletions(-)
>

Tested-by: Rinitha S <sx.rini...@intel.com> (A Contingent worker at Intel)

Reply via email to