> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-wired-lan <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Jacob 
> Keller
> Sent: 17 July 2025 22:27
> To: Nguyen, Anthony L <[email protected]>; Intel Wired LAN 
> <[email protected]>; Loktionov, Aleksandr 
> <[email protected]>
> Cc: Keller, Jacob E <[email protected]>; Grinberg, Vitaly 
> <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net 1/2] ice: fix double-call to 
> ice_deinit_hw() during probe failure
>
> The following (and similar) KFENCE bugs have recently been found occurring 
> during certain error flows of the ice_probe() function:
>
> kernel: ==================================================================
> kernel: BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free read in ice_cleanup_fltr_mgmt_struct+0x1d
> kernel: Use-after-free read at 0x00000000e72fe5ed (in kfence-#223):
> kernel:  ice_cleanup_fltr_mgmt_struct+0x1d/0x200 [ice]
> kernel:  ice_deinit_hw+0x1e/0x60 [ice]
> kernel:  ice_probe+0x245/0x2e0 [ice]
> kernel:
> kernel: kfence-#223: <..snip..>
> kernel: allocated by task 7553 on cpu 0 at 2243.527621s (198.108303s ago):
> kernel:  devm_kmalloc+0x57/0x120
> kernel:  ice_init_hw+0x491/0x8e0 [ice]
> kernel:  ice_probe+0x203/0x2e0 [ice]
> kernel:
> kernel: freed by task 7553 on cpu 0 at 2441.509158s (0.175707s ago):
> kernel:  ice_deinit_hw+0x1e/0x60 [ice]
> kernel:  ice_init+0x1ad/0x570 [ice]
> kernel:  ice_probe+0x22b/0x2e0 [ice]
> kernel:
> kernel: ==================================================================
>
> These occur as the result of a double-call to ice_deinit_hw(). This double 
> call happens if ice_init() fails at any point after calling ice_init_dev().
>
> Upon errors, ice_init() calls ice_deinit_dev(), which is supposed to be the 
> inverse of ice_init_dev(). However, currently ice_init_dev() does not call 
> ice_init_hw(). Instead, ice_init_hw() is called by ice_probe(). Thus,
ice_probe() itself calls ice_deinit_hw() as part of its error cleanup logic.
>
> This results in two calls to ice_deinit_hw() which results in straight 
> forward use-after-free violations due to double calling kfree and other 
> cleanup functions.
>
> To avoid this double call, move the call to ice_init_hw() into 
> ice_init_dev(), and remove the now logically unnecessary cleanup from 
> ice_probe(). This is simpler than the alternative of moving ice_deinit_hw()
*out* of ice_deinit_dev().
>
> Moving the calls to ice_deinit_hw() requires validating all cleanup paths, 
> and changing significantly more code. Moving the calls of ice_init_hw() 
> requires only validating that the new placement is still prior to all HW 
> structure accesses.
>
> For ice_probe(), this now delays ice_init_hw() from before
ice_adapter_get() to just after it. This is safe, as ice_adapter_get() does not 
rely on the HW structure.
>
> For ice_devlink_reinit_up(), the ice_init_hw() is now called after 
> ice_set_min_max_msix(). This is also safe as that function does not access 
> the HW structure either.
>
> This flow makes more logical sense, as ice_init_dev() is mirrored by 
> ice_deinit_dev(), so it reasonably should be the caller of ice_init_hw().
> It also reduces one extra call to ice_init_hw() since both ice_probe() and
ice_devlink_reinit_up() call ice_init_dev().
>
> This resolves the double-free and avoids memory corruption and other invalid 
> memory accesses in the event of a failed probe.
>
> Fixes: 5b246e533d01 ("ice: split probe into smaller functions")
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/devlink/devlink.c | 10 +---------
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c        | 24 +++++++++++-------------
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>

Tested-by: Rinitha S <[email protected]> (A Contingent worker at Intel)

Reply via email to