On 2025-08-27 16:41:09 [+0200], Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > From the results I posted before, the machine (CPU Intel E3-1220) with > the I350 NIC can provide about 59k HW TX timestamps per second without > any of the patches, about 41k with the original patch, and about 52k > with this patch and pinned aux worker.
I might have similar hardware with a i350 to give it a try. The old worker approach and the pinned AUX worker are identical from software design (or: I am not aware of any significant differences worth to mention here). Therefore I don't understand why the one had 59k and the other 52k. Sebastian
