On 8/27/2025 7:52 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2025-08-27 16:41:09 [+0200], Miroslav Lichvar wrote: >> From the results I posted before, the machine (CPU Intel E3-1220) with >> the I350 NIC can provide about 59k HW TX timestamps per second without >> any of the patches, about 41k with the original patch, and about 52k >> with this patch and pinned aux worker. > > I might have similar hardware with a i350 to give it a try. > The old worker approach and the pinned AUX worker are identical from > software design (or: I am not aware of any significant differences worth > to mention here). Therefore I don't understand why the one had 59k and > the other 52k. > > Sebastian
Right. If we can get further reproduction of this setup that would be good. Thanks, Jake
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
