On 10/25/25 18:58, Kohei Enju wrote:
There are off-by-one bugs when configuring RSS hash key and lookup
table, causing out-of-bounds reads to memory [1] and out-of-bounds
writes to device registers.

Before commit 43a3d9ba34c9 ("i40evf: Allow PF driver to configure RSS"),
the loop upper bounds were:
     i <= I40E_VFQF_{HKEY,HLUT}_MAX_INDEX
which is safe since the value is the last valid index.

That commit changed the bounds to:
     i <= adapter->rss_{key,lut}_size / 4
where `rss_{key,lut}_size / 4` is the number of dwords, so the last
valid index is `(rss_{key,lut}_size / 4) - 1`. Therefore, using `<=`
accesses one element past the end.

Fix the issues by using `<` instead of `<=`, ensuring we do not exceed
the bounds.

[1] KASAN splat about rss_key_size off-by-one
   BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in iavf_config_rss+0x619/0x800
   Read of size 4 at addr ffff888102c50134 by task kworker/u8:6/63


[...]


Fixes: 43a3d9ba34c9 ("i40evf: Allow PF driver to configure RSS")
Signed-off-by: Kohei Enju <[email protected]>
---
  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c
index c2fbe443ef85..4b0fc8f354bc 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c
@@ -1726,11 +1726,11 @@ static int iavf_config_rss_reg(struct iavf_adapter 
*adapter)
        u16 i;
dw = (u32 *)adapter->rss_key;
-       for (i = 0; i <= adapter->rss_key_size / 4; i++)
+       for (i = 0; i < adapter->rss_key_size / 4; i++)
                wr32(hw, IAVF_VFQF_HKEY(i), dw[i]);
dw = (u32 *)adapter->rss_lut;
-       for (i = 0; i <= adapter->rss_lut_size / 4; i++)
+       for (i = 0; i < adapter->rss_lut_size / 4; i++)
                wr32(hw, IAVF_VFQF_HLUT(i), dw[i]);

this is generally the last defined register mapping,
so I get why KASAN is able to report a violation here
(I assume that we map "just enough")

impressive, and thanks for the fix!

Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <[email protected]>

iavf_flush(hw);

Reply via email to