On 06/15/2012 03:13 PM, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: >> > But it's standard and it is C++. > But (I think) the point was: what should have we used for the last > 10-15 years of QString?
I could've been a bit clearer in my initial post, but I intended to know if there was currently any reason that justified having QString around instead of simply using what's already included in C++'s standard library. Rui Maciel _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
