I'd say one reason is the encoding awareness of QString alone is a good reason. Fiddling around with libicu and alike is a mess. Regarding the int to string thing. Who codes C++ without boost nowadays? boost::lexical_cast ftw.
Greetz, Mike On 15.06.2012, at 12:50, Rui Maciel <rui.mac...@gmail.com> wrote: > Does anyone know what's the rationale for relying on Qt's custom QString > instead of simply using C++'s standard and omnipresent std::string? > > > Thanks in advance, > Rui Maciel > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
