On Tuesday 08 October 2013 06:48:38 BRM wrote: > > Cool - I don't have any at this time, but it's good information to have and > I'm sure others here do; and yes, listing the license is perhaps the one > change that would be good to do - even for the Open Source libraries.
The license is already listed, but we should add some way of filtering for the license. -- Cornelius Schumacher <schumac...@kde.org> _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
