Op 9-10-2013 7:34, Cornelius Schumacher schreef: > On Tuesday 08 October 2013 06:48:38 BRM wrote: >> Cool - I don't have any at this time, but it's good information to have and >> I'm sure others here do; and yes, listing the license is perhaps the one >> change that would be good to do - even for the Open Source libraries. > The license is already listed, but we should add some way of filtering for the > license. > Not only for the license, but on many other things. I, for one, do not like to go through a huge list of libraries one at a time. Rather, I'd like to use some keywords to search for libraries that seem to offer the component I'm after.
Also useful: user ratings, maturity, what versions of Qt it works with, last update, screenshots (in case of widgets or Quick components), etc. André -- You like Qt? I am looking for collegues to join me at i-Optics! _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest