Thanks, I did not see the discussion of Replicant before. Seems like they would like DDS as well. Actually I would like to see the Qt Service Framework restored to the core and have DDS implemented as a transport mechanism in addition to QLocalSocket and DBus. This way applications are written using standard Qt, but can be deployed using tranport mechanisms appropriate for the use case at hand.
-----Original Message----- From: interest-bounces+douglas.k.miller=navy....@qt-project.org [mailto:interest-bounces+douglas.k.miller=navy....@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 3:38 PM To: interest@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Interest] Data Distribution Service as a new Qt IPC? On Monday 14 July 2014 19:04:15 Miller, Doug wrote: > It seems to me that Qt should look into having the Data Distribution > Service > (DDS) as an IPC. Some have already written a Qt wrapper for it. It > is crossplatform, has open source implementations, extends beyond > machine boudaries, requires no infrastructure, can be encrypted, and, > in alot of cases, is appropriate for real-time. Even aviation plaforms are > using it! > > DBus works on Windows, but not as well as it does on Linux, and it has > no intention of ever moving beyond machine boundaries into a network. > > What do you think? If you have intention to do that, go ahead and request the repository. Note also the discussions about Replicant about a month and a half ago. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
