I've seen two proprietary Qt wrappers for DDS, but the one I saw online before I can't seem to find now. The proprietary wrappers were achieved with modest effort. The point is that there is interest in such a wrapper and that an open sourced version could be easily obtained. DDS has a spec (just like DBus) from which a wrapper could be built that would position it to work with any vendor's DDS c++ implementation.
________________________________ From: Jereme Lamothe <jlamo...@docboxinc.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 10:15 AM To: Miller, Doug Cc: interest@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Interest] Data Distribution Service as a new Qt IPC? I'd be very interested to see this as well, and to contribute when possible. I'm currently working on a project with multiple processes communicating lots & lots of data over a network via DDS. Doug, you mentioned having seen Qt wrappers for DDS in past. Are these internal to where you work, or could they be found online? On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Miller, Doug <dmil...@jfti.com<mailto:dmil...@jfti.com>> wrote: Thanks, I did not see the discussion of Replicant before. Seems like they would like DDS as well. Actually I would like to see the Qt Service Framework restored to the core and have DDS implemented as a transport mechanism in addition to QLocalSocket and DBus. This way applications are written using standard Qt, but can be deployed using tranport mechanisms appropriate for the use case at hand. -----Original Message----- From: interest-bounces+douglas.k.miller=navy....@qt-project.org<mailto:navy....@qt-project.org> [mailto:interest-bounces+douglas.k.miller<mailto:interest-bounces%2Bdouglas.k.miller>=navy....@qt-project.org<mailto:navy....@qt-project.org>] On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 3:38 PM To: interest@qt-project.org<mailto:interest@qt-project.org> Subject: Re: [Interest] Data Distribution Service as a new Qt IPC? On Monday 14 July 2014 19:04:15 Miller, Doug wrote: > It seems to me that Qt should look into having the Data Distribution > Service > (DDS) as an IPC. Some have already written a Qt wrapper for it. It > is crossplatform, has open source implementations, extends beyond > machine boudaries, requires no infrastructure, can be encrypted, and, > in alot of cases, is appropriate for real-time. Even aviation plaforms are > using it! > > DBus works on Windows, but not as well as it does on Linux, and it has > no intention of ever moving beyond machine boundaries into a network. > > What do you think? If you have intention to do that, go ahead and request the repository. Note also the discussions about Replicant about a month and a half ago. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com<http://intel.com/> Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org<mailto:Interest@qt-project.org> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org<mailto:Interest@qt-project.org> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
