2015-01-10 11:35 GMT+01:00 René J.V. <rjvber...@gmail.com>: > On Saturday January 10 2015 11:29:56 Tomasz Olszak wrote: >>2015-01-10 11:05 GMT+01:00 René J.V. <rjvber...@gmail.com>: > > So in other words, there's backwards ABI compatibility which means more or > less that only new features are added? > That makes sense. > > If this principle was in place for Qt 5.2 too, I can thus upgrade my Linux > box's Qt 5.2 (Ubuntu 14.04) to Qt 5.3.2 (backported from Ubuntu Vivid Velvet) > without breaking the slew of packages that depend on Qt5? > Yes here is some draft of explanation: http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt-Version-Compatibility
And here is interesting article about it: https://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Binary_Compatibility_Issues_With_C++ _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
