> On 04 Apr 2016, at 15:18, Konstantin Tokarev <annu...@yandex.ru> wrote: > > > > 04.04.2016, 15:13, "Emre Besirik" <nome...@gmail.com>: >>> * XML tags completion for known tags. This can be done for *.UI files, and >>> maybe some part of *.QS. Basic XML structure is already know - so even for >>> unknown XML variants - the IDE knows what tag to close. >>> * Class implementations - for example, I derive from an interface and >>> pressing control+enter on the type will add missing methods. >>> * When I define an inline class (Java, but can be done using lambda >>> expressions in C++), just pressing control+enter will write the code for >>> me. For example: >>> >>> AlertDialog.Builder builder = new AlertDialog.Builder(this); >>> builder.setPositiveButton(android.R.string.ok, new ___ >>> >>> Pressing "control+enter" will create a new anonymous class which derives >>> new DialogInterface.OnClickListener() >>> * >>> When a method argument is an enum, code completion works on the >>> corresponding enum, and adds the needed type. >>> * >>> Automatically know how to modify R"code" for example here: >>> ListView mListView = findViewById(R.id.notifications_list_view); >>> it will suggest to typecast to ListView (to fix - again, control+enter). >>> * >>> While debugging the values of variables are displayed inside the text >>> editor, in light gray (no more looking for them in a panel). >>> * >>> When using connect, using Niko's example, I would like to type >>> connect(button, [clicked], this, [playTheFunkyMusic]) >>> and QtCreator should automagically find the signals of button, and the >>> corresponding slots of "this". It used to work in ond style Qt4 signals, >>> but with modern connections, I need to type the whole type. Some signals >>> are hard to find, for example the "click()" signal from QButton comes from >>> QAbstractButton. This means that when an object "has/provides" a signal, I >>> need to guess the parent type which defined the signal in order connect it >>> (I did not have to know this in Qt4). >>> * >>> When I am lost "control+enter" usually fixe stuff for me. >>> * >>> Multiple cursors (see the demo on SublimeText's home page - its epic, and >>> Atom badly implements it), >> >> * Search! (like spotlight search with just one shortcut key to open file or >> go to a particular location in your code): >> >> * search symbols >> * files in your project >> * search everywhere >> * you can lookout jetbrains IDEs for more examples >> * Smart code completion. and by smart I mean for instance; if I’m going to >> assign something to an int type do not suggest me different return types of >> functions or variables. do smart things like; if I’m creating/assigning a >> variable something for first time suggest me things like object >> initializations first depending on the object type. And try to do these >> without delays as much as possible. cache, index, think beyond the box. >> * Do things so obvious your self, do not wait for me to do. >> * tabs — the current working type of open documents are really annoying. if >> you have split view open, first you need to select the view you intend to >> change open document. I dont know how many times I’ve changed the >> non-intended document in workspace >> * ONE key to kill all other views and leave code windows open only (like >> distraction free mode of intellij) >> * go proactive, generate getters/setter and stuff like that. >> * have a dark UI mode :) >> * have tons of more keyboard shortcuts (check out intellij) >> * have a better user friendly UI >> >> I’m sorry to say this but QtCreator is actually eons behind the current IDE >> trends and technology :( >> Just checkout the comments at the link I shared in my first post, people are >> practically begging jetbrains to save themselves from QtCreator (no offense >> intended but this is the case for many people) >> And I think Qt Company should just get rid of the denial of the world start >> to see beyond horizon and do something, revolutionize QtCreator or just do >> something like Google did for android studio and embrace/deal with jetbrains >> ide and fork a CLion custimized for Qt development. I dont see anyother way >> :( > > There is a fundamental difference here with Android Studio case: IntelliJ > Idea is an open-source product, while CLion isn't (and is not even > free-as-in-beer, which is a dealbreaker for many people). > > -- > Regards, > Konstantin
Well there must be something can be done, Qt Can use Intellij like google did, I know its a little bit more work compared to CLion fork but it is possible. Or at least a plugin for intellij platform maybe? I mean as long as you want to be part of the solution... Regards/Saygilar, Emre Beşirik nome...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
