The thing is stuff that needs to chage (i think) can't just be covered by some feature requests, tons of things need to change. There should be a team of UI/UX experts who should reshape the whole thing. :(
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Nikita Krupenko <krne...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2016-04-05 16:03 GMT+03:00 NoMercy <nome...@gmail.com>: > > I think after countless agruments in this thread I will try to do that at > > best I can or find some interested people and help them maybe :( > > But the thing is that I'm sorry that after some point when 90% of Qt > > users/developers start to use/see/accept other IDEs as default for Qt > > development instead of QtCreator when there is a real good alternative, > > people will feel sorry coming this thread scratching their head and > thinking > > what we have done wrong... after that point winning people back to > QtCreator > > will be hard as hell and countless hours spent developing QtCreator will > be > > in vein because there will be left around 15 people left happy around > their > > closed environment. > > > > And people keep saying that it is open source, you do it, why don't you > do > > it etc. well it maybe open source but I think Qt company is payed well > > considering the license costs, why dont Qt Company do something about it? > > isn't it Qt Company's official product after all? > > If you want to change something in QtCreator, you can use two > different approaches: > > 1. "Hey, your IDE is wretched, I don't like it. Throw away all your > code and create new IDE from scratch. Or even better, don't waste time > and add Qt support to my favorite IDE. And I don't want to offend > somebody, just saying that it's rubbish." > > 2. "Hey, there is a good IDE xxx. It has nice features, that are > missing in QtCreator: feature1, feature2, etc. What do you think about > adding this features? I can create tickets in JIRA if you are agree > that it would be good to have this features in QtC (or even volunteer > to implement some of them)." > > I think, the second approach more constructive. >
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest