> -----Original Message----- > From: Interest <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Henry Skoglund > Sent: Tuesday, 18 December 2018 19:26 > >> I think the point is not to switch, but to provide an additional > >> build. I'm going to guess the requestors' argument is going to be > >> that they still need to ship 32-bit applications for Windows, since > >> they still have users with 32-bit Windows, despite running on a 64-bit CPU. ....
> Now about UWP. earlier this year Microsoft's Office Team ditched their UWP > flavor of MS Office and now the Edge team has done the same (since Chromium > will never be an UWP app). I bet you a beer with anyone having access to the > download numbers of those 6 different UWP Qt 5.12 components, that the # of > downloads for them has steadily decreased all of this year. Most likely UWP is > heading to the same place in the sky where Silverlight etc. are. So I mean if > the # > of component slots in Maintenance Tool is a limiting factor, consider tossing > the > 3 MSVC-2015 UWP ones to make room for the MinGW 32-bit one. You have a very good point here. We'll investigate the figures and come back here. Thank you. -- Alex _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list [email protected] https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
