We all get frustrated at times and sometimes that frustration comes out in 
posts (hopefully with a short <sarcasm></sarcasm> tag..) but Roland’s posts 
_always_ have put downs for almost every other kind of developer except those 
in the medical/space community. I consider myself having pretty thick skin and 
I can ignore those posts (Gmail server side rules make sure of this) but at 
some point Roland needs to be told in no uncertain terms that the list is for 
questions/answers not long tirades. I don’t mind discussing the merits of the 
different systems, use-cases of those systems, developer learning and all that. 
Those can be enlightening discussions in and of themselves. But at some point, 
we as a community, just need to let Roland know that his demeanor is not 
conducive to getting responses on the list and soon will no longer be tolerated.

 

-- 

Michael A. Jackson                 400 S. Pioneer Blvd
Owner, President                   Springboro, Ohio 45066
BlueQuartz Software, LLC           EMail: mike.jack...@bluequartz.net


 

From: Interest <interest-boun...@qt-project.org> on behalf of René Hansen 
<ren...@gmail.com>
Date: Monday, February 11, 2019 at 10:16 AM
To: Jason H <jh...@gmx.com>
Cc: Qt Interest <interest@qt-project.org>
Subject: Re: [Interest] Netiquette [was: Feature Request - QtCreator - Multiple 
right margins]

 

I'm with Jason here.

I use Qt for mobile development as well, and I don't think a ban is the right 
course of action. Choice of words is a pre-eminent selector in deciding which 
posts to take seriously. Using terms in the the manner Roland does about phone 
development, in all likelihood, self-disqualifies any serious consideration his 
posts might have received otherwise. Although a shame, that is repercussion 
enough in my opinion.


/René

 

On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 15:07 Jason H <jh...@gmx.com> wrote:

The truth is I often enjoy the hyperbole. In my book it's better to have a 
thick skin rather than to go around being offended by everyone and asking for 
them to comply with a fragile nature. However this most recent post put down 
the Qt mobile community of which I am a significant member having been using Qt 
in mobile for about the past 5 years. I have argued repeatedly for more 
attention in the Mobile platforms (except WinRT) and the message was directly 
contrary to that aim. I pointed out (off list) ironically what should happen is 
port the application to mobile and just let Samsung make and revise the 
hardware faster than he ever could. Didn't draw any ire but it didn't go 
anywhere either. I'm starting to wonder if the hyperbole isn't for comedic 
effect. 

My plan of action is that I'm just going to ignore this person's snarky posts 
which comes with the price that I might have the answer to their issue and I 
won't contribute it. 

I on occasion post something snarky because I am frustrated with the problem 
I'm having. I wouldn't want to be banned over it. There is a social capital 
here, add I try to have a positive balance. And I think it's reasonable that 
when you fall below zero, you stop getting replies. I would not bring in the 
CoC just yet. 

> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2019 at 8:18 PM
> From: "Konstantin Shegunov" <kshegu...@gmail.com>
> To: m...@herrdiel.de
> Cc: "Interests Qt" <interest@qt-project.org>
> Subject: Re: [Interest] Netiquette [was: Feature Request - QtCreator - 
> Multiple right margins]
>
> >
> > [...]
> > I do appreciate the open discussion style on this list. I even do
> > appreciate a somewhat harsh style, if it has a factual base and is
> > getting straight to the point instead of b*s*ing around. But those
> > lengthy wallpapers our President of Logikal solutions commonly utters,
> > have long since crossed the border from amusing to annoying.
> >
> 
> I, myself, still perceive them more as amusingly misguided, than really
> angering (annoying at times, yes). This is just me, though, I have
> experience with that kind of thing. However, I can very well imagine how
> you, and most certainly others, are finding them taxing; not surprising at
> all.
> Plus, as I rule, I tend to discard anything that references fortran or
> cobol as examples of anything ... ;)
> _______________________________________________
> Interest mailing list
> Interest@qt-project.org
> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
>
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest

_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list 
Interest@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest 

_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest

Reply via email to