That would be the FUD

On 3/16/21 6:00 AM, James Maxwell wrote:
I am afraid of the following: "(ii) use Licensed Software for creation of
any software created with or incorporating Open Source Qt"
what does licensed software mean? If I have Qt commercial, do I always use
Qt under commercial license and thus cannot create any software using open
source qt?

Been hashed out on here many times. __Never__ fully resolved.

At one point the licensing was worded in such a way that if you were using Qt commercial you could not use Wireshark, Doxygen, or any of the OpenSource projects built with Qt. Visit the archive page: https://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/ pull down the zipped files for the past 18 months or so and unzip them into a directory tree. Use Sublime Text 3, Emacs, or just plain grep to search for wireshark, doxygen, and commercial in different searches. That should identify all of the message threads.

There was no real resolution.

At one point the wording was so broad and vague that if anyone anywhere at Intel had a commercial license, Thiago couldn't work on OpenSource Qt. You will find that discussion in the archive as well.

Many of the companies I'm in contact with have either begun or completed the abandonment of Qt.

For now my policy has been:

If a client wants me to use commercial Qt, it is their license on their machine. Period.

The half dozen machines in my office have only the OpenSource stuff.

If you feel compelled to straddle the fence, then go onto eBay (or where ever) and get yourself a ~$300 off-lease computer for your OpenSource development and a KVM switch so you can use your same monitors and toggle between two machines.

Right now that is the only way I have found to be "sure."

Study up on the alternatives because an industry wide migration appears to be happening. One of the best known manufacturers of high end video/audio products for concert halls, movie making, theaters, all the way down to conference rooms and your own home theater dumped Qt during the pandemic. As entrenched as Qt was there I didn't think it was physically possible. They did it in under a year. That was the solution they were forced into.

FUD + death-of-perpetual-license = mass-company-exit

--
Roland Hughes, President
Logikal Solutions
(630)-205-1593

http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com
http://www.infiniteexposure.net
http://www.johnsmith-book.com
http://www.logikalblog.com
http://www.interestingauthors.com/blog

_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest

Reply via email to