You're right, but there's also a general problem about the thickness. IM draws my OC48 links the same he draws my DS3 links ! This is not coherent at all.
--On Thursday, August 28, 2003 12:46:14 PM -0700 Doug Weathers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > About the thickness of the link lines: a line looks thicker when it's at an angle > than when > it's horizontal or vertical > > This is probably because of the shape of the "pen" used to draw the line - it's > square, and > wider across the diagonals. > > If it were possible to draw the lines with a circular "pen", they'd look the same at > every > angle. > > Is this practical? > > Later, > > Doug > > > -- > Doug Weathers, Network Administrator > St. Charles Medical Center > >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/28/03 06:36AM >>> > Hello there, > > this is a really important feature request to me. > > I'd like it possible to define a default duplex value for (giga|fast|*)ethernet > interfaces. I > have some maps with dozens of ethernet links, all full-duplex (who does half again > ??), and > it's such a pain to have to go on each link to specify it's a full duplex one. > > I know IM can't determine this as there's no standard SNMP object for this (as far > as I know > and have looked for), but just an option to specify the default, please :) > > Another request (already asked for it with no answer): the drawn links sizes are not > coherent. > I have some 2,5Gbs links that appear smaller than the gigabit links. Could the > thickness of > the link really be dependent of it ifSpeed, and not just react on gigabit ones ? > > > Thank you. > -- > Jerome Fleury > > ____________________________________________________________________ > List archives: > http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/ > To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > IMPORTANT NOTICE: This communication, including any attachment, contains > information that may be confidential or privileged, and is intended solely > for the entity or individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the > intended recipient, you should delete this message and are hereby notified > that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message is strictly > prohibited. Nothing in this email, including any attachment, is intended > to be a legally binding signature. > > > > ____________________________________________________________________ > List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/ > To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jeje. ____________________________________________________________________ List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/ To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
