Intermapper has descover a few new servers that show a warning of a
192.168.100.5 (0.0.0.5)
(Warning: Discontiguous subnet mask!)
Interface Statistics
Utilization: n/a % (of Unknown speed
However, looking at the ipAddrTable table shows the correct mask.
Does anyone have any ideas on how this happens?
The subnet mask comes from ipAddrTable. We've seen cases where the
subnet mask can be reported wrong by buggy SNMP agents depending on how
the table is traversed. This sounds like another case; please
double-check by turning on the "Log Network Events" log for the IP
address using Help -> Diagnostics -> Detailed Logs...
If we can isolate a check that detects when the wrong information is
reported, we can fallback to an alternate traversal method for the
ipAddrTable.
--
Bill Fisher
Dartware, LLC
____________________________________________________________________
List archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/
To unsubscribe: send email to: [email protected]
