Here is a sample result; I don't see any reference to masks: 11:35:46 Richardson-grid: Send IfCountsHC(id=1056ae70) row = 3, comm = ********, ver SNMPv2c 11:35:46 Richardson-grid: Receive IfCountsHC(id=274116208) :: vars=3f ifIndex=3 speed=1000000000 highSpeed=1000 hcByts=[73130859131,5029687362] ucPkts=[67536243,44727838] mcPkts=[18,0] bcPkts=[0,0] errs=[0,0] disc=[0,0] admStat=1 oprStat=1 lastChange=0 uptime=15469671 11:35:46 Richardson-grid: Send IfCountsHC(id=1056ae80) row = 5, comm = ********, ver SNMPv2c 11:35:46 Richardson-grid: Receive IfCountsHC(id=274116224) :: vars=3f ifIndex=91 speed=1000000000 highSpeed=1000 hcByts=[36519685720480,1082251565456] ucPkts=[1061479065,4252358254] mcPkts=[627917,0] bcPkts=[0,0] errs=[0,0] disc=[0,0] admStat=1 oprStat=1 lastChange=1504 uptime=15469679 11:35:46 Richardson-grid: Send IfCountsHC(id=1056ae90) row = 92, comm = ********, ver SNMPv2c 11:35:46 Richardson-grid: Receive IfCountsHC(id=274116240) :: vars=3f ifIndex=92 speed=1000000000 highSpeed=1000 hcByts=[613999778828,34928378302988] ucPkts=[161030449,3451329307] mcPkts=[24,0] bcPkts=[0,0] errs=[0,0] disc=[0,0] admStat=1 oprStat=1 lastChange=1504 uptime=15469687 11:35:46 Richardson-grid: Send IfCountsHC(id=1056aea0) row = 205, comm = ********, ver SNMPv2c 11:35:46 Richardson-grid: Receive IfCountsHC(id=274116256) [DONE] 11:35:46 Richardson-grid: Send customDevice(id=1056aeb0) row = 0, comm = ********, ver SNMPv2c 11:35:50 Ashburn-mgmt: Send IfCountsHC(id=1056aee0) row = 5, comm = ********, ver SNMPv2c 11:35:51 Ashburn-mgmt: Receive IfCountsHC(id=274116320) [DONE] 11:35:51 Ashburn-mgmt: Send customDevice(id=1056aef0) row = 0, comm = ********, ver SNMPv2c CStreamServer -- streamConnectionConnected CStreamServer -- streamConnectionReceivedLine CStreamServer -- streamConnectionReceivedLine CStreamServer -- streamConnectionReceivedLine CStreamServer -- streamConnectionReceivedLine CStreamServer -- streamConnectionReceivedLine CStreamServer -- streamConnectionReceivedLine CStreamServer -- streamConnectionReceivedLine CStreamServer -- streamConnectionDisconnected CStreamServer -- streamConnectionConnected CStreamServer -- streamConnectionReceivedLine CStreamServer -- streamConnectionReceivedLine CStreamServer -- streamConnectionReceivedLine CStreamServer -- streamConnectionReceivedLine CStreamServer -- streamConnectionReceivedLine CStreamServer -- streamConnectionReceivedLine CStreamServer -- streamConnectionReceivedLine CStreamServer -- streamConnectionReceivedLine CStreamServer -- streamConnectionReceivedLine CStreamServer -- streamConnectionReceivedLine
IfTable still shows correct mask. -- Paul PH: (402) 443-5174 cell: (402) 219-3783 On Sep 3, 2010, at 2:11 PM, William Fisher wrote: > >> Intermapper has descover a few new servers that show a warning of a >> 192.168.100.5 (0.0.0.5) >> (Warning: Discontiguous subnet mask!) >> Interface Statistics >> Utilization: n/a % (of Unknown speed >> >> >> However, looking at the ipAddrTable table shows the correct mask. >> Does anyone have any ideas on how this happens? > The subnet mask comes from ipAddrTable. We've seen cases where the subnet > mask can be reported wrong by buggy SNMP agents depending on how the table is > traversed. This sounds like another case; please double-check by turning on > the "Log Network Events" log for the IP address using Help -> Diagnostics -> > Detailed Logs... > > If we can isolate a check that detects when the wrong information is > reported, we can fallback to an alternate traversal method for the > ipAddrTable. > > -- > Bill Fisher > Dartware, LLC > ____________________________________________________________________ > List archives: > http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/ > To unsubscribe: send email to: [email protected] > > ____________________________________________________________________ List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/ To unsubscribe: send email to: [email protected]
