Dear InterMapper Experts, I am also facing a similar problem in providing redundancy for InterMapper monitoring solution.
I have read the following threads: #1 RE: [IM-Talk] maintaining map sync between two servers http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04426. html #2 Re: [IM-Talk] Server Redundancy http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg02873. html #3 Re: [IM-Talk] Re: Server Redundancy http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg02867. html In #1, Tony proposed using 2 IM server and provide some scripting (external to IM) to sync the Maps and Charts of the 2 server. However, what do we do with notification and existing recorded data? Does this means we have 2 sets of recorded data in IMDC? I like the proposal in Thread #2, to have InterMapper Primary and Secondary architecture which can automatically sync maps, charts, notification & preferences/settings, and have notification only kick in on the secondary should the primary server failed. Also, is it possible to have only secondary IM write to IMDC as the same dataset of primary should the primary fail? Since thread #2 date back to 2006, has this featured been implemented or put on the roadmap for future release? Lastly, is there an updated best-practice to provide redundancy then the strategy mentioned in the threads above? Regards, Leonard Siu Quantum Data Systems (H.K.) Ltd. http://www.quantum.com.hk ____________________________________________________________________ List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/ To unsubscribe: send email to: [email protected]
