This didn't deliver when I mailed it last week. here's a second try.
On May 16, 2012, at 13:33, dschnur wrote: > > > 2. If you aren't already, try using Chrome or a very recent version of > Firefox. Especially if you're on IE8 or earlier, a significant portion of > the wait time comes from waiting on IE, not Reports itself. I use Safari on my Mac. is there a benefit to using firefox or chrome for Mac users? > > 3. Set up everything except the filters, then let it sit in a separate tab in > the background while you do other stuff. Once it does come up, add the > filter and then save the report. You can then load the saved report by > clicking the 'saved reports' button at the bottom of the splash screen, > eliminating at least some of the stuff that it needs to load up-front. > I'll try this. I think it did eventually load after a while, that might help. > I am a little surprised that performance is so poor, though. I don't > remember whether you've already provided this info in any support tickets, > but how many devices & interfaces are you monitoring? one intermapper server's worth: 2775 devices, ~60k interfaces for a week or so we had a second InterMapper server spun up while we prepared for and did an OS upgrade on our main server (our imdc instance is on a different system), so some of that is still in the database. although at the moment it looks like the database went from being a 52G file size to a 5G file size, so I'm thinking we just lost most of our data somehow. -- -debbie Debbie Fligor, n9dn Lead Network Engineer, CITES, Univ. of Il email: [email protected] <http://www.uiuc.edu/ph/www/fligor> "Every keystroke can be monitored. And the computers never forget." ____________________________________________________________________ List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/ To unsubscribe: send email to: [email protected]
