On Sun, 22 Jun 2003, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jun 2003, Johann Hanne wrote:
> > The point is that with valueretrieval set to 0, the SNMP value is still
> > retrieved with snprint_value()/sprint_value(). I've been really really
> > careful with this...
> >
> > Of course the statement "The way SNMP values are retrieved has been
> > changed" isn't quite correct. The way SNMP values are retrieved has
> > been made *adjustable*. Sorry if this has been misleading.
>
> Yes, that would have alleviated some fears. Given that the default is to
> not break any BC, I have no objections to this patch.
I'm still not convinced that we should allow such an 'important' change
in a bugfix release. From my POV it still can not be seen as a bugfix
patch.
Derick
--
"Interpreting what the GPL actually means is a job best left to those
that read the future by examining animal entrails."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl/
International PHP Magazine http://php-mag.net/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
