not only that but those people who want this performance boost can use apc. i'll give george a patch that solves this if no one else steps up.
-sterling On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 10:20:08 -0700, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nah, I dread the INI word. It makes applications less portable. > I prefer rolling back than doing this. > > Andi > > > > At 10:09 AM 7/16/2004 -0700, Sara Golemon wrote: > >"Andi Gutmans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > I don't think it's critical to include this patch, but I do think it'd be > >a > > > good thing. > > > Do you really think it'll break BC for many applications? How many people > > > have functions that use null(), false(), true()? > > > > >I know people hate the dreaded "ini option" word. But how about one for > >this? That'd let the optimization work for the 99% of scripts that don't > >need to implement null(), true(), and false(), and allow those rare few to > >simply disable it for BC. > > > ># Note: I'm no lexx expert, this syntax may not even make sense > > > ><ST_IN_SCRIPTING>"TRUE" { > > if (CG(fast_constants)) { > > ZVAL_TRUE(zendlval); > > return T_TRUE; > > } else { > > yymore(); > > } > > } > > > >-Sara > > > >-- > >PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > >To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
