On Wed, Dec 2, 2020, at 2:18 AM, Christian Schneider wrote:
> Am 01.12.2020 um 21:13 schrieb Reindl Harald (privat) <ha...@rhsoft.net>:
> > Am 01.12.20 um 21:09 schrieb Stanislav Malyshev:
> >>> we are running error_reporting E_ALL for 17 years now and don't
> >>> distinct between notice / warning / error, it has to be fixed -
> >>> period
> >> Surely you do. Your code continues to run after warning/notice but stops
> >> after the error. It's impossible to ignore that. Unless you have an
> >> error handler that does exit() after a notice (which I have hard time
> >> believing, honestly, but who knows), there is a very major distinction.
> > 
> > my server would trigger a mail every 15 minutes wioth all warnings and 
> > notices to enforce fixing the issue
> 
> Out of curiosity: What is your fix?
> 
> Because we are running into this issue with fuzzers bombarding our 
> website with all types of illegal parameters, string containing 0-bytes 
> amongst them.
> 
> Our solution was to basically throw away all user input containing 
> 0-bytes (except $_FILES) which feels awkward but was the only way to 
> avoid these messages (and in some cases exceptions) consistently.
> 
> Concerning the original question:
> My personal preference in this specific case is Stas’ way: is_file() is 
> a low-level function and should simply return false for *anything* 
> which is not a valid, existing filename. Having *everything* involving 
> paths warn/throw an exception when 0-bytes are involved is an overly 
> broad generalization.
> 
> I challenge everybody to show me how changing is_file() to simply 
> return false (while keeping more high-level functions like, say, popen 
> throwing an exception) leads to a security hole.
> 
> In my preferred world the following code would be both safe and 
> guaranteed to report „File not found“ on any invalid input:
>       If (is_file($filename))
>               do_something($filename);
>       else
>               message("File not found“);
> 
> I’ll try to put a PR together for FileFunction() because I think those 
> functions should all handle 0-bytes like non-existing files.
> 
> - Chris

I'm inclined to agree here.  An is_*() function isn't asking why something 
isn't a legit file; "missing" and "it's a stupid name anyway and it should feel 
bad" and "the disk is missing" are all the same thing as far as it's concerned. 
 All it's asking is "if I try to open this file, should I expect it to work?"

Having it throw an exception in some cases, it's understandable how that ends 
up happening, but from a user/API point of view it's still incorrect.

--Larry Garfield

--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to