Le Thu, 17 Jun 2021 08:30:43 -0500, "Larry Garfield" <la...@garfieldtech.com> a écrit : > > > The ? character was chosen for the placeholder largely because it was > > > unambiguous and easy to implement. Prior, similar RFCs (such as the > > > original Pipe Operator proposal from several years ago) used the $$ > > > (lovingly called T_BLING) sigil instead. So far no compelling argument > > > has been provided for changing the character, so the RFC is sticking > > > with ?. > > > > The main argument for $$ is to be able to have partial methods with $$->, > > this should be stated in this paragraph. > > That's not something that was ever brought up in the discussion.
Finally found where I read that, it’s in an other RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/first_class_callable_syntax#partial_function_application Côme -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php
