On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 6:00 PM Andreas Heigl <andr...@heigl.org> wrote:
> Hey list. <snip> > Which performance improvement of the "original state" of the RFC? As > that was one of the questions that were not 100% answered: What are the > benefits for the language. And while those 8 bit that Nikita mentioned > in the "Motivation" part of the RFC look nice, he also stated that "this > is a fairly long-term benefit that will require additional technical > work to realize". > I think these two messages might have some information about the performance improvements: https://externals.io/message/115800#115848 https://externals.io/message/115800#115872 Yes, maybe not everything was captured in the final RFC text. I also think all the evaluated options should have been present in the RFC as it brings more context to voters. Regards, Alex
