On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 at 20:51, Larry Garfield <la...@garfieldtech.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023, at 12:32 PM, Dan Ackroyd wrote: > > > > > $fnConstructor = Closure::fromClassConstructor(Zoq::class); > > // signature of $fnConstructor is the same as `function(Fot $fot): Zoq` > > > > Or for individual methods: > > > > $fnMethod = Closure::fromClassMethod(Zoq::class, 'Pik'); > > // signature of $fnMethod is the same as `function(Zoq $zoq, string > > $zebranky): Frungy` > > I don't think that actually helps. If you have the object already,
Neither of new functions I was suggesting have the object already. Only the type. > If you do not have the object already, then we run back into the issue > I pointed out before where we need to differentiate a bindable from > needs-binding callable, That's not what I suggesting. Danack wrote: > > $fnConstructor = Closure::fromClassConstructor(Zoq::class); > signature of $fnConstructor is the same as `function(Fot $fot): Zoq` That doesn't need a binding at all. Danack wrote: > > $fnMethod = Closure::fromClassMethod(Zoq::class, 'Pik'); > signature of $fnMethod is the same as `function(Zoq $zoq, string > $zebranky): Frungy` First parameter is the object to be operated on. You wouldn't need to do any binding. *magic* would happen inside the function to take care of that. > I think that's a prerequisite for adding any dedicated syntax > for "make a closure that doesn't work until it gets bound". To be clear, I don't support anything like that. As I wrote: Danack wrote: > > That sounds like a complete non-starter. Adding something to the > language that produces a closure that can't be called would be an > instant new entry for PHPSadness. cheers Dan Ack -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php
