> That being said, I support your RFC. It seems like a better solution than 
> mine. However, I would ask you to change your tone to be less offensive,
> because rudeness is not a welcomed behavior on the mailing list, and by the 
> way, we have the same ultimate goal of improving PHP, even if you are
> unsatisfied with a past decision of mine.
>

I personally would love to see someone give FFI more love than it's received. 
It's got so much potential if it can become easier and less clunky / more 
straightforward to use. It seems like this particular functionality was 
implemented but it appears (at least to me?) that it doesn't have a clear 
caretaker who is putting in the work to really polish it up, improve the 
documentation, and make it accessible to the masses. I know I'd love to use it 
rather than having to write or use a custom PECL extension, but any time I've 
tried to play with it the barrier was too high to be productive.
Tone aside (I agree calling things stupid isn't productive.. this isn't the 
linux kernel mailing list circa 2010), it seems like there is a lot of 
frustration being caused by this lack of attention.. It feels like an aspect of 
PHP no one uses because most don't understand how to use it well -- Perhaps 
Chopins would you be willing to lead that charge? I can't imagine there are 
many voters on this list who even would have a strong opinion at this point on 
any changes we do make to improve the situation, so it seems like any well 
thought out proposal would likely succeed. Unless of course I'm grossly 
underestimating the popularity of FFI today.. in which case perhaps I should 
take my thoughts to the docs mailing list..
John

Reply via email to