> On 9. Oct 2025, at 20:54, Larry Garfield <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> One outstanding question is whether to allow reordering of parameters in the 
> PFA closure by using named arguments.  With this implementation, Arnaud says 
> it's possible to do if we decide to.  I am still concerned that it would 
> create too much complexity and confusion in practice.  But we're willing to 
> go with a broad consensus if it emerges.

Hi

I also find it confusing if I define a different parameter order in the partial 
function and then this order is automatically overridden to the original order 
rather than being used. When I consciously change the parameter order, I expect 
this order to be preserved in the resulting function. That's the behavior I 
would expect as a developer.

Cheers

Joshua Rüsweg

Reply via email to