SG>>random than a catch statement. It's a deliberate, directed statement, and SG>>one which *does* clean up after itself despite your unfounded claims to the SG>>contrary.
My objection to goto is based on the fact that it allows to randomly transfer control between arbitary points of script, which can (and will) easily lead to spaghetti code and actually promotes this style of writing code. It has nothing to do with goto cleaning or not cleaning anything. SG>>But if we're going to make charged statements, then how about this? I SG>>suspect that your objection to goto lies in the "problem" such a construct SG>>makes for accelerators (Zend Accelerator specifically). If that's your SG>>objection then at least state so honestly. Please drop this tinfoil-hat conspiracy baloney, really. It's not funny. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Products Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/ +972-3-6139665 ext.115 -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
