On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Pierre wrote: > On 7/18/06, Ilia Alshanetsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Pierre, > > > > Will all due respect, option C is what we did when it came to 5.1, except > > instead of 5.3 it was 5.2. Sure, we can delay this indefinitely, but I for > > one would like some resolution on the issue. But if the general consensus is > > to continue treading water, I guess we can do that too... > > It is the less worst solution. We give a delay to our users to adapt > their code and consider a migration.
Well, you could already have started that in December as you simply knew this was going to come up again. If you (pear, not pierre) want to keep sticking the head in the sand that is fine, but don't come with comments like the above then in order to delay perfectly good code that people want. Derick -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
