Hi, On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 09:33 +0400, Dmitry Stogov wrote: > At least, I have one additional namespace related patch, that is not > accepted yet. > > Renaming may require a lot of additional work with it.
Well, in my experience it's simpler to do such renaming inside an patch (then it's a simple sed command) than after committing it to the tree where you have to make sure not to accidentally rename other, unrelated, stuff, too. That's the reason why I tried to do the renaming asap. > Also, I am not sure that allbody agree with "package". I didn't read all mails in that thread but from what I saw only Stanislaw was against renaming it. I for myself don't care really much about the name, but I tend to follow Marcus's argumentation[1] for "package", it tastes a bit better for me. What I would like is a soonish decision so we can advertise that feature and get people testing it and playing with it without having to fear that their (test-)code breaks the next day. (I didn't say it won't brake the next day then, but it's good to give less excuses for not testing that stuff. This testing would also include mysqlnd, unicode and whatever else we have in HEAD right now) johannes [1] http://news.php.net/php.internals/31328 > Thanks. Dmitry. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Derick Rethans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 10:25 PM > > To: Dmitry Stogov > > Cc: 'PHP Internals List' > > Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] Renaming namespaces to packages > > > > > > On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Dmitry Stogov wrote: > > > > > I have no serious objections about renaming. I am asking to wait a > > > bit. > > > > If you think "package" is fine, why wait with renaming it? > > > > regards, > > Derick > > > > -- > > Derick Rethans > > http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org > > > -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
