In my opinion namespaces should be in 6 not 5.3 but ignoring that:
+1 for Issue 1 option 1
+1 for Issue 2
2008/10/16 Nathan Rixham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Steph Fox wrote:
>
>> Please can those people who didn't already express a clear and relevant
>> opinion, express it now? We don't have long to play with this if there's
>> to
>> be namespace support in 5.3.
>>
>> At present it looks like a two-horse race between #1 full disambiguation
>> (:::) and #3 explicit disambiguation ('use namespace').
>>
>> Method of tally: anything that would be acceptable to the voter gets a
>> point. (A weighted version is also offered here.)
>>
>> D/S means 'with different separator'.
>>
>> Name Issue A Issue B
>> ======================================================
>> Greg #2 (alt #3, #1) Yes
>> Guilherme #3 Yes
>> Kalle #4 Yes
>> Tony Bibbs #3 Yes
>> Jaroslav Hanslik #1 (alt #3) Yes
>> Nathan Rixham #4 (D/S) N/A
>> Liz #1 or #3 Yes
>> Andrei - 'agreed with Gregs approach' N/A
>> Janusz Lewandowski #4 Yes
>> Steph #3 (alt #2) Abstained
>> Josh Davies - '#1 and #2 are functionally the same' N/A
>> Hannes - put in a plea for classes only in 5.3 N/A
>> Lester - WROTE SOMETHING LOUD N/A
>> Alexey #3 Yes
>> Marc Boeren #1 (D/S) N/A
>> Derick #1 No
>> Vesselin Kenashkov #3 Yes
>> Lars #3 (alt #2) N/A
>> Karsten Damberkalns #1 (alt #3) Yes
>> Jochem Maas #2 (alt #3, #1) Yes
>> Richard Quadling #1 (alt #2) No
>>
>> Issue A:
>> #1 - 8 (1 with different separator)
>> #2 - 5
>> #3 - 11
>> #4 - 3 (1 with different separator)
>>
>> Issue A weighted (first choice gets 2 points, rest 1):
>> #1 - 12 + 2 = 14
>> #2 - 4 + 3 = 7
>> #3 - 12 + 5 = 17
>> #4 - 6 + 0 = 6
>>
>> Issue B:
>> Yes - 11
>> No - 2 (see Richard's rationale tho')
>> Abs - 1
>> N/A - 7
>>
>>
> you can add me down for a +1 on the solution to Issue B as well
> - makes logical sense
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
