Hello Lukas,
--stas_s->option->because_I_could_not_read_that_code;
marcus
Thursday, October 16, 2008, 6:51:29 PM, you wrote:
> On 16.10.2008, at 16:14, Steph Fox wrote:
>> Please can those people who didn't already express a clear and
>> relevant
>> opinion, express it now? We don't have long to play with this if
>> there's to
>> be namespace support in 5.3.
>>
>> At present it looks like a two-horse race between #1 full
>> disambiguation
>> (:::) and #3 explicit disambiguation ('use namespace').
>>
>> Method of tally: anything that would be acceptable to the voter gets a
>> point. (A weighted version is also offered here.)
>>
>> D/S means 'with different separator'.
> i guess i should note that Steph's tally only includes votes on Greg's
> proposal. Stas proposal is obviously also still up for vote. In that
> sense "doesnt work" is maybe a bit too harshly said in the appendix of
> Greg's proposal, though it does obviously point out an issue. Overall
> no proposal comes without some caveat (or this all would be easy).
> regards,
> Lukas Kahwe Smith
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Best regards,
Marcus
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
