great work - just one little note that may/may not help..

after much more thought I think you're option #2 is actually best however the choice of ":::" separator in the example really confuses things and makes at an instant turn off..

I honestly think that if the option was rewritten as let's say:
one::step:>two()
one:>step::two()
(or indeed any other double-char operator) then it would make a lot more sense, visually, logically and perhaps be the winner here..

Regards and thanks for the massive amount of patience :-)

--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to