Marshall Greenblatt wrote: > Hi Stas, and All, > > I understand that there is a strong desire for this thread to be dead. > However, after reading this and all related threads and wiki, I find that > one item is still unclear, at least to me. > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> And how exactly it serves the needs of people by secretly making their >> applications orders of magnitude slower, and then saying "oh, that's because >> you failed to read paragraph 16.4.5.1 in the manual, you should really >> read that paragraph before pretending to be PHP programmer!". Good >> environment or does what you want it to do, or fails, explaining to you why >> it doesn't work - it doesn't do it half way half broken and then blames you >> for not reading some obscure note in the manual. That's not how I see >> helping. > > > What, if any, performance penalty should we expect with the proposed > namespace changes when executing existing code that does not use > namespaces? Do we need to change existing namespace-free code in order to > avoid any potential performance penalties? Has anyone benchmarked the > changes yet to see if the performance penalty, if any, is actually > significant for some set of common usage cases? > > If it's too soon to answer that last question then perhaps the whole > performance debate is a bit premature.
Existing code should see no change in performance from the previous PHP 5.3 alpha, and a significant improvement from PHP 5.2. In fact, code that uses a lot of static method calls or class constants might see a slight (imperceptible) performance increase, as a few hash lookups would be removed. I have not benchmarked this. Greg -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
