On 26 Nov 2008, at 18:56, Marcus Boerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Stanislav,
why not have a secondary extension definition in ext/hash?
Wednesday, November 26, 2008, 7:06:03 PM, you wrote:
Hi!
Then again, we maintain BC aside from this single call to
determine if
the extension is loaded, so I guess yeah .. lets just remove it ..
we
are expecting people to update their code.
If we have function-level BC - why not just add stub extension with
dependency on hash.
I looked at this but php.h would want to include a mhash header file,
at least I think that's what it was from memory.
Scott
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
