On 24.03.2010 01:16, Zeev Suraski wrote: > For me it is a requirement before the code makes it into a released > version of PHP, and I think many others think that way if past > discussions are any indication. That's what RFCs are for - if people > can just go ahead and implement their original thoughts without > paying attention to feedback, why bother? > Personally I think that the person pushing the code should be > responsible for implementing the feedback to the RFC (or getting > others to do it).
I think you're missing something. I don't care if FPM is in or out of the core. The only thing I get in case if it's accepted is more troubles as I'll have to maintain it. Nevertheless, I feel that it's a good thing, therefore I'm pushing it in. But if somebody wants me to rewrite a substantial and well-tested part of the code in order to use another syntax style just because XML is "too complex for mere mortals" - I won't do it. If there are any volunteers to do this - go ahead, let's see what happens. If there are none - fine, I have enough stuff to maintain already. -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal --- http://pinba.org - realtime statistics for PHP -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
