On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Jani Taskinen <jani.taski...@sci.fi> wrote: > 24.3.2010 12:02, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: >> >> On 23.03.2010, at 23:04, Andi Gutmans wrote: >> >>> What about defining a release manager for the next release? I think that >>> is an important aspect of moving things forward. I also thought the dual >>> RM in PHP 5.3 worked quite well although it is not necessarily a must. >> >> >> Yeah, lets get that clarified. Derick has stepped up and seems quite >> committed and nobody seemed to oppose him RMing the next release. In case he >> feels he needs support he can propose a co-RM, after all its important that >> the two RM's know and trust each other well so that they can speak with a >> consistent voice. >> > > Yeah, lets. I'm fine with Derick. IIRC Rasmus also volunteered. Either one of > them or both as long as Lukas and Pierre keep their hands off.
Please keep your pointless comments for yourself, thanks. And to get a clue about what we are talking about may help (or prevent) such stupid comments. One key part of Rasmus comments was: to get the fun back. Your attitude in general actually has the exact opposite effect (and if it was only with me, I could not care less but it is not). Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
