hi, I will apply the patch to trunk later today as it seems that we have no objection for the patch itself. The proposal to add more information on failure can be implemented later, if someone fills motivated enough to do it.
Cheers, -- Pierre On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote: > hi, > > On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Ilia Alshanetsky <i...@prohost.org> wrote: >> Instead of removing a warning, why not add an additional parameter to the >> function that would instruct it to silence warning messages on parse >> failure? > > What are the actual usefulness of these warnings? I see absolutely no > need to keep them. > > However, it would be useful to have an optional parameter to get why > an URL actually failed. But that can be done later. > > Cheers, > -- > Pierre > > @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org > -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
