Hi, On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Denis Gasparin <denis.gaspa...@edistar.com>wrote:
> > As I pointed out last week, we needed these functions for several reasons: > > - the same features are not available directly via sql commands. > - we needed PDO in order to use the doctrine framework but we needed to > verify the transaction status and use the pgsql copyFrom/To functions > - for performance and optimization, we needed to avoid to open two > connections (one with the old driver and one with the PDO one). > > When I developed the functions, I patched the specific pgsql PDO driver > (not the global one) and I did it following the convention used for other > pgsql PDO functions (or for other DBMS specific PDO functions: for example > pgsqlLOBCreate or sqliteCreateAggregate). > > > As I wrote last week, according to me too the best solution would be to > share the PDO opened connection between the old pgsql driver and the PDO one > That was the original way we tried to develop the patch without success. > > What were the problems you had? > If anyone could give me any tip to follow, I would try to develop it. > > Thank you, > Denis > > > ----- Messaggio originale ----- > > Da: "Pierre Joye" <pierre....@gmail.com> > > A: "Ferenc Kovacs" <i...@tyrael.hu> > > Cc: "Jonathan Wage" <jonw...@gmail.com>, "Denis Gasparin" < > denis.gaspa...@edistar.com>, "Ilia Alshanetsky" > > <i...@prohost.org>, "Matteo Beccati" <p...@beccati.com>, > internals@lists.php.net, "pdo" <p...@lists.php.net> > > Inviato: Giovedì, 3 giugno 2010 21:14:20 > > Oggetto: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] New PDO methods for PostgreSQL driver > > > On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Ferenc Kovacs <i...@tyrael.hu> wrote: > > > > > This discussion has a long history, and it would be better to > > > actualy do > > > something about the problem, because it seems that it won't going to > > > disappear by itself. > > > I don't want to be rude, but the PDO v2 spec was last modified in > > > 2008.01.23. the problems with the current PDO architechture are the > > > same that Wez pointed out in his FAQ and spec. > > > > Nobody wanted to contribute to this pdo v2 spec as it was not open > > (CLA and all the bad things brought by such things). > > > > > > > > Agree, but currently I don't see any point in waiting, if we don't > > > do anything else beside waiting. > > > > There are discussions about that on the PDO list in the past. However, > > it is because we failed to start discussions that we should give up > > and continue to add bad designed features to PDO, with all respects to > > the author of the patch. > > > > Now let begin an open discussion to define what we actually need for > > PHP to continue to rock the web. > > > > Cheers, > > -- Pierre > > > > @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org > -- Jonathan H. Wage (+1 415 992 5468) Open Source Software Developer & Evangelist sensiolabs.com | jwage.com | doctrine-project.org | symfony-project.org You should follow me on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/jwage You can contact Jonathan about Doctrine, Symfony and Open-Source or for training, consulting, application development, or business related questions at jonathan.w...@sensio.com
