Hi Derick, I'm all for it. Although I have karma, I'm not an active PHP core contributor, but I would like to participate of such discussion, mainly because I have plenty experience with Annotations from another languages.
I'll spend some time re-reading the entire Annotations thread and come up with another proposal at the right time. Regards, On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Derick Rethans <der...@php.net> wrote: > Hi! > > The RFC on annotations for PHP http://wiki.php.net/rfc/annotations > suggests to add new syntax to the language to provide meta data for use > in reflection. This sort of meta data is usually provided in the form of > docblocks, which this RFC does *not* state isn't good enough. > > The discussion on the mailinglist did not provide a clear consensus for > either for or against. We could put this up for a vote, but I feel that > that is not useful right now, because a few issues needs to be sorted > out first. First, where we actually require annotations (over the > current practise of using docblocks); and secondly whether we really > want to introduce another syntax into the PHP scanners and parsers. > > For now I would suggest that this proposal needs to be sorted out before > we can even suggest of putting it in PHP 5.4. > > cheers, > Derick > > -- > http://derickrethans.nl | http://xdebug.org > Like Xdebug? Consider a donation: http://xdebug.org/donate.php > twitter: @derickr and @xdebug > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- Guilherme Blanco Mobile: +55 (16) 9215-8480 MSN: guilhermebla...@hotmail.com São Paulo - SP/Brazil -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
