Derick Rethans wrote:
Actually, Kalle just pointed out that it compiles just fine. In that case, I think we should put it in trunk and in the 5.4 alpha.
As long as it is disabled by default and can easily be replaced by preferred alternatives ... eaccelerator is still working fine now that it has been upgraded to handle 5.3 ... although it would be nice to see some more up to date comparisons. Although I suspect in reality, the combination with database and other caching activity means that a straight comparison may be a little meaningless? Change the database and the figures are going to be different anyway ... so a straight comparison on non-database code would be a little more practical.
-- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk// Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
