I too must second Mike's comments about pecl_http not being quite ready for bundling. The extension provides some useful functionality, no doubt (I use it ;-)). But I don't think there is a good case for bundling it.
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Michael Wallner <m...@php.net> wrote: > On 11/23/2010 10:57 AM, Derick Rethans wrote: >> >> On Mon, 22 Nov 2010, Felipe Pena wrote: > >>> - pecl/http was planned to be bundled. What's the status? >> >> I'm all for it; but again, it's just copying it over to trunk before we >> branch. > > ... >> >> - copy over APC/pecl_http >> - branch on thursday >> - alpha next week >> - build a list of things that needs doing in 5.4 to get it ready (with >> possible options to get rid of apc/pecl_http if they are not up to >> date enough) > > Huh? I'm quite surprised to read that pecl/http is planned to be bundled > with trunk, while--sure--my grand master plan included this option, there's > only pecl/http/branches/DEV_2 which is compatible with trunk and I doubt > you all are talking about that version? > > It still needs some serious amount of work, development has stalled again > due to my job's demands. > > Cheers, Mike > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
