Hi Rasmus, On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf <ras...@lerdorf.com> wrote: > On 05/09/2011 07:44 AM, guilhermebla...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> - Annotations >> >> I already proposed a patch and none here discussed. You rather >> preferred to shout "PHP doesn't need Annotations" instead of discuss >> the patch that was proposed. > > If someone doesn't agree that annotations belong in PHP why do the details > of the patch matter?
The actual concern is that someone didn't agree with that and (re-read the thread to comment this), also confirmed that never used Annotations and have a "very superficial knowledge" of the possibilities, than to me it's more than clear to me that it's not a valid opinion. If it is for you, then PHP has a problem. > >> PS: I think that internals mailing list should be revised with all >> proposed ideas and wrap them on a better plan. >> It seems to me that you are not interested on user's request and >> rather accept/implement only what the features that interest you. It's >> very bad for the language and very bad for all of users. > > That's simply not true. But just because one group of users feel strongly > about something doesn't mean it should go in. There has to be some level of > curation or we end up with every feature under the sun resulting in a huge > mess. Are you sure? Please take a look at every topic defined on wiki page. Is there ANY topic to be discussed that came from userland? If you say yes, please point me to the thread. What I clearly see there is that every feature defined there came from users with php-src karma. Now I re-ask you, are you really sure it's only a small group that want something or do you now confirm that only php-src users have relevance on features request? > > -Rasmus > -- Guilherme Blanco Mobile: +55 (16) 9215-8480 MSN: guilhermebla...@hotmail.com São Paulo - SP/Brazil -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
