On 29.06.2011, at 22:20, Paul Dragoonis wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:49 PM, Ralph Schindler <ra...@smashlabs.com> wrote:
>> Correct.
>> 
>> I was hasty in that example, the first was copied & tested (and is reflected
>> in the test, as is that variation of what I wrote up.)
>> 
>> Either way, test and patch work in 5_3.
> 
> Doesn't this functionality confuse matters?
> 
> If this patch is added, is there now no difference between instanceof
> and is_subclass_of(). If this is the case my question is then why do
> we have two methods to do the same thing?
> 
> I thought instanceof was for parent classes + interfaces.. and
> is_subclass_of() was just for parent classes.

instanceof is a language construct and only operates on object instances.

David


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to