Could be, xcache is definetly dummer in features and it is its feature. I guess it helps it to keep up with releases. I will investigate this today, maybe get some interesting results worth to share here. 03.07.2012 16:54 пользователь "Rasmus Lerdorf" <ras...@lerdorf.com> написал:
> On 07/03/2012 09:49 AM, Arvids Godjuks wrote: > > One one side it's good to know i'm not wrong, on the other hand it's sad > > in this case. > > Sure about one thing - xcache is worth looking at and may be a better > > choise than APC and has better potential. > > One thing sure - I haven't heard anyone complaining about xcache. And > > heard many complains about APC. > > Well, that is simply not true. We get a lot of, "I tried xcache, but it > didn't work, so now I am trying APC" type of messages and bug reports in > the APC world. > > -Rasmus > > >
