hi, On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Maybe we could introduce a new namespace for the new api instead of turning > the new api oop only (or using objects for groupping static stateless > functions into objects only to hint that they are working with the same > variable types). > > Combining this with the previously mentioned lets turn namespaces to first > class citizens and allowing exporting whole namespaces to the current scope > would make it possible to make the new api available in the global scope if > needed. > Ofc this still would be a huge task to rethink/reshape our current api. This falls almost exactly to what I would avoid to do, having same set of functions but with new names or signatures, under a separate namespace. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
